Breaking News
Intel Hd Graphics Celeron N2840 Vs N3050
пятница 10 апреля admin 89
Based on 12,402 user benchmarks for the Intel Celeron N3050 and the Celeron N3450, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,206 CPUs. It has four cores with four threads and has a 1.1GHz base clock with a 2.2GHz boost, with the included HD 500 series graphics boasting 12 execution units running at up to. Intel Celeron N2840 vs. Intel Celeron N3050 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results.
| Description | Type | OS | Version | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel® Graphics Driver for Windows* [15.40] This download installs the Intel® Graphics Driver for Braswell, 4th and 5th generations. | Driver | Windows 10, 32-bit* Windows 10, 64-bit* Windows 8.1, 32-bit* 3 more | 15.40.45.5126 Latest | 3/25/2020 |
| Intel® Processor Identification Utility - Windows* Version This download installs version 6.2.0220 of the Intel® Processor Identification Utility for Windows*. Rawdigger 1.2.0 download. It's rather close to the top of the list now.Love it! | Software | Windows 10* Windows 8.1* Windows 8* 6 more | 6.2.0220 Latest | 3/11/2020 |
| Intel® Processor Diagnostic Tool Fsx eurocopter ec 135 cost. This download record installs the Intel® Processor Diagnostic Tool release 4.1.4.36, which is compatible with multiprocessor systems. | Software | Windows 10* Windows 8.1* Windows 8* 5 more | 4.1.4.36 Latest | 9/13/2019 |
| Intel® HD Graphics Production Driver for Windows* 10 32-bit (N-Series) This download installs the Intel® Graphics Driver for Braswell. | Driver | Windows 10, 32-bit* | 15.40.1.4256 Latest | 7/29/2015 |
| Intel® HD Graphics Production Driver for Windows® 10, 64-bit* (N-Series) This download installs the Intel® Graphics Driver for Braswell. | Driver | Windows 10, 64-bit* | 15.40.1.64.4256 Latest | 7/29/2015 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3710 vs N2840 among all CPUs
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
CPUBoss Score |
Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Intel N3710 |
| ||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 25.2 | vs | 12.9 | More than 95% better 3DMark06 CPU score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.45 mPixels/s | vs | 1.11 mPixels/s | Around 4x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | ||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | ||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | ||
| Much better performance per watt | 11.85 pt/W | vs | 7.05 pt/W | Around 70% better performance per watt | ||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | ||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 311 MHz | Around 30% higher GPU clock speed | ||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | ||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | ||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | ||
| ||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 60,300 MB/s | vs | 411.9 MB/s | Around 146.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | ||
| Higher clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | 35% higher clock speed | ||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.17 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | ||
Benchmarks Real world tests of N3710 vs Celeron N2840
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
summary | N3710 | vs | Celeron N2840 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 405 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 311 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | N3710 | vs | Celeron N2840 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.17 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.56 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 7.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 6.57 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.85 pt/W | 7.05 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 6.09W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |